EACC Raid Rocks Nairobi Planning Department as Sh65 Million Probe Deepens

The Ethics and Anti Corruption Commission (EACC) has intensified investigations into an alleged Sh65 million corruption scheme at Nairobi City County, leading to significant changes within the county’s planning department.

The probe focuses on allegations that senior county officials irregularly approved development applications and building permits in exchange for bribes. Investigators believe the suspected scheme may have operated over an extended period, involving several officials within the planning and development approval process.

EACC officers recently conducted searches at county offices and private residences linked to individuals under investigation. During the operation, investigators reportedly collected documents, electronic devices and financial records expected to assist in tracing the flow of funds.

The investigation has triggered administrative changes within the planning department as county leadership seeks to restore confidence in the approval system. Some officials linked to the ongoing probe have reportedly been reassigned, while others face further scrutiny as investigations continue.

County authorities have stated that they are cooperating fully with investigators and have pledged to support efforts aimed at uncovering any wrongdoing. Officials say the county remains committed to ensuring transparency and accountability in service delivery.

The planning department plays a critical role in approving building plans, development applications, and land-use changes across the capital. Any disruption within the department can have significant implications for developers, investors and residents seeking approvals for construction projects.

According to preliminary findings, investigators are examining whether developers and property owners were required to make unofficial payments to facilitate approvals or expedite applications. The alleged payments are believed to have bypassed official county revenue collection channels.

EACC officials have indicated that the investigation extends beyond a single department. The commission is reviewing records and transactions involving multiple offices that may have participated in or benefited from the suspected scheme.

Anti-corruption agencies have increasingly focused on county governments as part of broader efforts to strengthen accountability in public institutions. Authorities argue that corruption within approval processes can undermine urban planning regulations and reduce public trust in government services.

Experts in governance and urban development note that transparent planning systems are essential for orderly city growth. They argue that irregular approvals can contribute to unsafe construction practices, environmental concerns, and disputes over land use.

The latest developments have drawn attention from developers, professional associations, and residents who rely on county services. Many stakeholders are closely monitoring the investigation and its potential impact on ongoing and future projects within Nairobi.

County officials have reassured the public that essential services within the planning department will continue despite the ongoing investigations. Measures have reportedly been put in place to minimize delays and ensure that legitimate applications are processed according to established procedures.

The EACC has emphasized that the investigation remains active and that no conclusions should be drawn before all evidence is reviewed. Individuals under investigation are entitled to due process and remain innocent unless proven otherwise in court.

As the probe expands, investigators are expected to analyze financial records, interview additional witnesses, and review approval procedures that may have been exploited. The findings could influence future reforms aimed at strengthening oversight within county departments.

The outcome of the investigation is likely to shape public discussion on governance, accountability, and service delivery in Nairobi. Authorities maintain that any individuals found responsible for wrongdoing will face appropriate legal action in accordance with the law.